今天在星球(论坛类的知识服务)中回答了一个问题，问题大概是问到了关于职业选择的问题，我回答的时候，反问了一下提问者“你会开车吗？”
上午回答该问题后，整个下午以及晚上我都在思考， 我真的会开车吗? 我有紧盯自己长远的目标吗？我有经常校准自己的当下吗？
其实一直有反思自己的职业选择问题，这事持续了两年了。从一开始的头脑风暴想创意 -- 我适合干啥 -- 我的长远目标是啥 -- 我干啥能发挥自己最大价值 -- 当下我干的是否符合长远规划 -- 我下一步的方向在哪里。
最近可能也跟职场上的工作有关，跟自己的目标有些偏差，属于我理解的舒适圈发酵期或者说瓶颈期，等等吧。
按照自己给别人说的那样，其实自己该看看外面的行情了，我倒不怕看行情，只是空间太少了。最适合的就是做技术中台负责人，从0-1来帮助企业做数字转型。
今天上午，看到IBM2019年发的一篇关于中台的ppt，其实也是开了眼界，也算体现了自己之前的浅显见识。
之前，理解数据中台，是从阿里巴巴提出概念，大家盲从，到目前真正落地。其实中台关联的概念，包含太广了，小前端大中台、数据仓库、湖仓一体、大数据、数据孤岛、数据资产、数据合规、数据建设等等。
用前面IBM的ppt来概括就是数字中台：包含业务中台、技术中台。
- 业务中台：就是聚合业务微服务，提供更大的接口服务，侧重点在服务的整合。
- 技术中台：就是除业务服务之外的中台概念，比如数据中台、开放平台、移动中台、DevOps、Iot、区块链等等。
从这个角度来看，我之前以为的掌握数据中台可以在当前数字化大背景下找到不错的机会，还是比较片面的，格局小了。
所以呢，有时候就是不能觉得自己会点什么东西，就让自己膨胀，要时不时压一压自己的膨胀感，告诉自己还啥都不是。然后抬头看看目标，同时多看看业内其他高手的输出，阶段性的矫正自己的方向，掌握自己的节奏，找到自己的收获。
那我接下来，要基于我个人的目标结合当前工作的情况，思考如何才是对自己更有利的选择。
为了你可能对星球感兴趣，贴一张邀请图
-------------------------------- 原始问题-------------------------------- 这里贴一张图，还原下原始问题（也可以看图片后我的概述）：
这里也简述一下，便于看英文的朋友知道来龙去脉：
提问者：
* 1.背景：在某公司工作三年有余，喜欢做技术，平时也喜欢折腾一些中间件(组件)，公司用的kafka集群就是他兼职在维护
* 2.事件：偶然机会，领导计划独立运维小组来负责三方中间件，以保证稳定性，但是目前比较掌握组件的人目前只有他一个
* 3.问题：他纠结是选择一个以后代码较少的运维工作，还是继续编码工作，但是要想好如何跟领导沟通真实想法的问题
我的回答：
教练肯定教你，目光放远一点，几十米外。
这个问题，发表下自己的看法：如果自己想好了长远目标，这个问题很容易选择。
比如，要走技术专家线，毫无疑问，继续走开发打基础，做工具完成领导的托付。 如果要走管理，是不是考虑运维管理也可以呢？现在算不算一个契机呢？领导需要你，是不是说明有议价权，可以尝试谈一下是不是可以做这个小组的负责人呢？
就像前面说的，你会开车吗？ 会开的话，这个问题对你自己做选择应该比较简单。 就像脑图一样，从长远来看，已经自动帮你选择好了分支，你只需要再细化就可以了。
参考：ibm.com/downloads/cas/GJWEAWRP
English version translate by DeepL
Today I answered a question in Planet (a forum-based knowledge service), which probably asked about career choice, and when I answered, I asked the questioner rhetorically, "Can you drive?"
After answering that question in the morning, I spent the afternoon and evening thinking, `Do I really know how to drive? Do I keep my eye on my long-term goals? Do I regularly calibrate my present moment?
In fact, I have been reflecting on my career choice, something that has been going on for two years now. From the beginning of brainstorming ideas -- what I am suitable for doing -- what is my long-term goal -- what I can do to maximize my value -- whether what I am doing at the moment is in line with the long-term plan -- what is my next direction.
Recently, it may also be related to the workplace, and their own goals are a little deviated, belong to my understanding of the comfort zone fermentation period or bottleneck period, and so on.
In accordance with what they said to others, in fact, they should look outside the market, I'm not afraid to look at the market, just too little space. The most suitable is to be the head of the technical middle office, from 0-1 to help enterprises do digital transformation.
This morning, see IBM 2019 sent a PowerPoint on the middle platform, in fact, is also an eye-opener, but also reflect their previous superficial insight.
Before, understanding the data middle platform, from Alibaba proposed the concept, we blindly follow, to the current real landing. In fact, the concept of Middle Office is too broad, small front-end big middle office, data warehouse, lake warehouse as one, big data, data islands, data assets, data compliance, data construction and so on.
To summarize with IBM's PowerPoint, it is digital middle platform: including business middle platform and technology middle platform.
- Business middle desk: is the aggregation of business microservices, providing greater interface services, focusing on the integration of services.
- Technology middle desk: It is the concept of middle desk other than business services, such as data middle desk, open platform, mobile middle desk, DevOps, Iot, blockchain, etc.
From this point of view, I previously thought that mastering the data middle platform can find good opportunities in the current digital context, or rather one-sided, the pattern is small.
So, sometimes you just can't feel like you know something and let yourself expand, you have to press your own sense of expansion from time to time and tell yourself that you're not anything. Then look up at the target, while more look at the output of other masters in the industry, stage correction of their own direction, master their own rhythm, find their own gains.
Then my next, to be based on my personal goals combined with the current work situation, thinking about how to be more beneficial to their own choice.
In order that you may be interested in planet, post an invitation chart
! ink-question-notes-20220620-224043.png
-------------------------------- original question -------------------------------- Post a picture here to restore the original question (you can also see my overview after the picture):.
Here is also a short description for those who read English to know the context.
Questioner.
* 1. background: in a company working for more than three years, like to do technology, usually also like to toss some middleware (components), the company with the kafka cluster is his part-time in the maintenance
* 2. event: by chance, the leadership plans to independent operations and maintenance team to be responsible for the three-party middleware to ensure stability, but the current relatively master the components of the people currently only one of him
* 3. Problem: He is torn between choosing a later code less operations and maintenance work, or continue coding work, but to figure out how to communicate with the leadership of the real idea of the problem
My answer.
The coach must have taught you to look a little further away, a few dozen meters away.
This problem, to express their views: If you think about the long-term goals, this problem is easy to choose.
For example, to go technical expert line, no doubt, continue to go development to build the foundation, do tools to complete the leadership of the entrustment. If you want to go management, is it possible to consider operations and maintenance management? Now is not considered an opportunity? Leaders need you, is not that there is bargaining power, you can try to talk about whether you can do the head of this group?
As said before, you can drive? If you can drive, this question should be relatively simple for you to make your own choice. Just like the brain map, in the long run, has automatically helped you choose the branch, you just need to refine it again.
Reference: ibm.com/downloads/cas/GJWEAWRP